Doing my usual light reading and finding myself enjoying a great history of the Reformation (Diarmaid MacCulloch's "Reformation: Europe's House Divided"), looking for traces of PhD source material. I came across this little observation of his that during the Reformation, there was a shift in people's attitudes so that the Pope came to be seen as the devil's agent and the miracle of the Mass the most evil moment in their earthly experience. He likens it to a technique of German playright Berthold Brecht who would engender alienation ("Verfremdung") in his audience by making the familiar seem unfamiliar: a device to shock the audience into taking control of their perceptions of what was happening in front of them.
It's the classic tool of the revolutionary. What it does, though, is bring division, polarise opinion, and breaks connections where they ought to exist. We see it happening in history and in the church; what do you think of these possible "alienations"?
the reading of this liturgy is lifeless and devoid of faith.....scrap liturgy
daily Bible reading is a legalistic chore.....take or leave the Bible as a reference point for Christian faith
hymns and songs are impersonal, clinical and merely creedal......personalise and consumerise all worship,
local church isn't a real community......find church where I'm comfortable in community,
worship choruses are trite and shallow.......profound worship only happens during a meditation.
I could go on...I don't know whether these "swings" are fair, but it is a human trait and, let's be honest, "gets things changed". But I'm not convinced it's the way it ought to be. Sam Wells' "God's Companions" book talks of the church being a "community of memory and imagination". Our secular liberal worldview (the seeds of which were a motor for the Reformation) endeavours to wipe us free of memory. It's all one giant leap forward into the new and the better. Untrammelled postmodernity would wipe away any sense of the future, and reduce memory to a rosy-tinted heritage product.
I believe it's one of the great challenges for the church in our culture: to embrace a future with imagination whilst having full memories of who we are and where we came from. Those memories contain both the joys and pain, successes and disappointments of who we are. So, with respect to Brecht, let's be restless for change without having to demonise the present or erase the past.
Good point. I hadn't tohugth about it quite that way. :)Your article looks nice!
Posted by: Moncler outlet | September 15, 2011 at 04:07 AM
Thanks for the comments.Now all became clear, I thank for the help and I hope to see more such articles.
Posted by: Moncler outlet | September 15, 2011 at 04:17 AM
Who can for a moment doubt but that health is more likely to return when the path to the acquirement of it as are calculated to benefit the one, and divert the other.
Posted by: Moncler online shop | October 21, 2011 at 09:26 AM
The favorable opinion I entertain of the efficacy of the shores of Nice in arresting disease, induces me to observe, that the despondent invalid may there rest his longing eye
Posted by: Moncler outlet | October 21, 2011 at 09:30 AM
To improve the general consternation , the cousin pf Bohemond and the brother of Godfrey were detached from the main army with their respective squadrons of five
Posted by: moncler jacken | October 21, 2011 at 09:39 AM
according to that which I have spoken. And when the time cometh that evil fruit shall again come into my vineyard, then will I cause the good
Posted by: beats by dr dre | November 23, 2011 at 03:49 AM
both old and young, the first and the last, and the last and the first, that all may be nourished once again for the last time.
Posted by: Christian Louboutin Outlet | November 23, 2011 at 03:52 AM
And if it so be that these last grafts shall grow, and bring forth the natural fruit, then shall ye prepare the way for them, that they may grow; and as they begin to grow
Posted by: coach online outlet | November 23, 2011 at 03:54 AM